Founding work
Published institutional history traces the founding work to the Keith Institute.
ABOUT INCLUSIONSCORE
Our work connects standards, education, organizational evidence and professional services—so inclusion and workforce management can become accountable everyday practice.
OUR INSTITUTIONAL PURPOSE
Standardize and incentivize corporate inclusion.
InclusionScore’s founding work treats a lack of inclusion as an organizational risk. Our approach connects people, services and evidence rather than reducing inclusion to a statement of intent.
Through DISM, HR service management and AI management, we help professionals see how human participation and organizational accountability fit together.
Read the institutional record
THE INSTITUTIONAL RECORD
Selected documented milestones. Historical collaborations are identified as historical, and organizational certification is distinguished from professional education.
Published institutional history traces the founding work to the Keith Institute.
ISO 30415 and the DISM Forum emerged in the same period, supporting a shared professional language.
Historical DIP collaboration with Terry College of Business.
Deloitte Canada’s documented DISM case received public recognition on October 30.
Education and professional services bring inclusion, human work and AI management into a connected institutional framework.
LEADERSHIP & INSTITUTIONAL EXPERTISE
Leadership and subject-matter expertise from the published institutional record. These profiles do not imply teaching assignments for a specific course.

Engineer and institutional founder whose work connects data ethics, inclusion and organizational change.

Professional experience across data leadership and trade-association environments.

Technology and risk-management experience supporting institutional capability.

Published ISO 30415 convener history and professional expertise in inclusion standards.
INTERNATIONAL PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
The published historical professional network spans 25 countries across five continents. It provides context for our work—not a claim that every participant is an authorized current delivery partner.
Many contexts.
One commitment to
accountable practice.
Canada · United States · Mexico · Colombia · Chile · Brazil
Austria · Belgium · Bulgaria · Denmark · Finland · France · Germany · Ireland · Italy · Luxembourg · Netherlands · Spain · Sweden · Turkey · United Arab Emirates
Uganda · South Africa
Singapore · Australia
OUR METHODOLOGY
Inclusion practice organized through 32 domains and four service types.
A service-management approach to the responsibilities, evidence and performance of human work.
AI management connected to human oversight, lifecycle controls and organizational services.
A maturity architecture supporting structured assessment and improvement thinking.
PUT STANDARDS INTO PRACTICE
Tell us what you want to achieve. We’ll help identify the right training, assessment or professional services pathway.
Talk to InclusionScore